The revelations and photographic proofs supporting them about Taj Mahal being Tejo Mahalaya are nothing new.

It does not come onto the mainstream media in a big way only because the media fears a communal backlash. For the same reason, the historians have not been allowed to open the sealed doors, lest they find Hindu idols and the like inside.

I do not agree with us accepting it as Taj Mahal. By doing this, we are attributing its greatness to an outsider (Mughal king). And calling a temple as a mausoleum is definitely unacceptable. As it was originally a temple built by a Hindu king, it should rightly be given its status as thus, and our Indian rulers credited for it.

In fact, on Mr.Stephen Knapp’s site, you will find several other temples that have been “converted” into mosques, and Vedic signs found as far off as Egypt and Italy.

This rechristeneing of “Tejo Mahalaya” as “Taj Mahal” is similar to calling many Indian scientific discoveries like “Indian numbers” and “Baudhayana Theorem” as “Arabic numerals” and “Pythagoras Theorem”.

Regards

Nikhil Mundra